If a bobblehead makes noise on the TV and it isn't watched, does it still make a sound?
When I was asked about an accident that happened about a mile away, a car apparently ended up inside of a Miami Subs restaurant last night, I admitted I didn't have a clue.
We heard sirens in the distance and I just didn't realize what was going on.
I did look online about this particular story and couldn't find it which was probably for the best.
Thinking about it though, it did drive a point. I stopped watching TV news years ago. Fire, Murder, Corruption, Theft, Weather, Sports, and Chirpy Close all crammed into 22 minutes plus 8 minutes of Commercials and other "important" stuff all dumbed down to a Least Common Denominator level of intelligence to entertain, and not necessarily inform.
It got too easy to find news online, to skim the headings and read those things that mattered - to me. With a little effort you could find a way to drop in your email box any story you want, targeted to what you are actually interested in. Something called an RSS Feed from your favorite news website takes a lot of that targeting and makes it easy. Frankly, the amount of information that you get from that "Rich Site Summary" is generally more than your favorite bobble head will give you on some of the longer ongoing stories.
I simply find the RSS Link and save that as a bookmark. It reads in Firefox or other browser and allows me the option to read deeper or skip with minimal effort. Not as shiny and flashy, but functional and fast.
I already do that, and while it could be too easy to miss something because you've pigeon holed yourself by reading only those stories that are interesting to you, it's a lot more effective. The serendipity of stumbling across a story that may be out of your normal scope is a wonderful thing, but a bit ineffective use of time.
TV has long become either the First or Second Screen in most people's lives. First World Problems aside, I'm lost without a laptop when I'm watching a show. Easy enough to look up a reference. Since I always watch TV on a digital recorder, I skip through commercials, pause at random points, and surf while doing other things.
Broadcast news isn't one of those habits I picked up again. Easy enough to reduce a news program on TV to less than 15 minutes. Sports is irrelevant to me as well as other specific stories. For that matter, a DVR would be required for news so I could skip through the fluff pieces and thinly veiled commercials that pass for information.
I tried it after I moved here to South Florida. I had accidentally recorded the hour of news broadcast and found myself watching one story. It was forgettable, but before long they moved onto some detailed explanation of the opening of a business in another county and my thumb started hitting the skip button. I also found myself screaming at the TV in frustration because it wasn't really all that "Fair and Balanced" local news, it was pretty painfully tilted to their one closed way of thinking.
Independent news went out with the Fairness Doctrine and isn't coming back soon since it isn't profitable.
I did turn on RSS on this blog. I know a few people do read it that way since the statistics I see show it. I guess I'm "Eating My Own Dogfood" by following a philosophy that I tend to live by myself.
Most major news organizations allow you to read their news that way.
NPR has a large collection of RSS Feeds.
BBC does as well although you will have to use a separate feed for each topic.
NASA lets you get caught up on their field of Space Exploration in depth if you require.
MSNBC has them on their various pages as well.
And the local papers have them available.
It all makes it a lot easier to get the news you need and not be force-fed by someone else's interests.